Naomi Wolfe and Mary Wollstonecraft live
in very different time periods. One lives in a time before the female rights
movements of the 20th century and the other after both. They both demand
the education of women, their liberty from both themselves and the expectations
put towards them in society. Although living in different time periods I’m sure
that both women would’ve gotten along famously if they ever met. They both
agree on so many subjects relating to women’s rights that I felt it necessary
to write about it.
Wollstonecraft talks about society’s
effect on women when she says in her book that women are, “Taught from their infancy that beauty is
woman's scepter, the mind shapes itself to the body, and roaming round its gilt
cage, only seeks to adorn its prison.” (Wollstonecraft 71). According to Wollstonecraft,
British women consider beauty above all else in society, as they treat it as
their way of getting ahead in life. Although not the focus of women’s lives in
our day and age, women’s pursuit of beauty is still an issue. Wolf says that,
“Many are ashamed to admit that such trivial concerns—to do with physical
appearance, bodies, faces, hair, clothes—matter so much.” (Wolf 9).
Their views
on beauty’s role in women’s lives do seem parallel but what is more outstanding
is their opinion on how we can move onward and progress the rights of women.
Both of them believe in a system of education that promotes women as equals to
men and counters the negativity directed at women. Wollstonecraft says that, ”Till women are more rationally educated,
the progress in human virtue and improvement in knowledge must receive
continual checks.” (Wollstonecraft 84). Where Wollstonecraft talks of education,
Wolfe talks about a change in mentality,
“A woman wins by giving herself and other
women permission—to eat; to be sexual; to age; to wear overalls, a paste tiara,
a Balenciaga gown, a secondhand opera cloak, or combat boots; to cover up or to
go practically naked; to do whatever we choose in following—or ignoring—our own
aesthetic.” (Wolf 290)
They
are two authors that have never met and never will. They’ve both impacted the
people around them and both are heavy contributors to the women’s rights movement
of the 70’s and 80’s.
No comments:
Post a Comment